Lines blurred by 'legal highs'

Jeremy Browne, the Liberal Democrat Home Office minister, is to be commended for trying to straddle one of the Coalition’s widest ideological divides

Editorial
Wednesday 26 June 2013 19:47 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

More people have used so-called “legal highs” in Britain than in any other European Union country, according to a United Nations report. This poses an awkward question for the Government, although it is no consolation to critics of conventional drugs policy either. Some of those who argue for the decriminalisation of psychotropic drugs might welcome the fast-growing market for the new substances that are constantly being created and marketed in a legal twilight zone just in front of the advancing edge of prohibition.

Yet there are obvious risks in an unregulated market in which no one knows about the health effects of the new products. In practice, the consequences of this supposedly booming market seem limited. The drugs concerned are often outlawed only because of their chemical resemblance to substances already banned.

But no one can argue that the present state of affairs is satisfactory. Jeremy Browne, the Liberal Democrat Home Office minister, is to be commended for trying to straddle one of the Coalition’s widest ideological divides. As well as trying to make the legal response to the development of new chemical formulae faster and more flexible, he has sought to find out and present the facts of more liberal approaches to drugs in Portugal and other EU countries to his sceptical Conservative colleagues.

This newspaper has long recognised that blanket criminalisation is far from the best drugs policy. Addiction should be treated as a medical problem not a criminal one, and the best protection against the misuse of dance drugs – as it is for cannabis – is information, information and information. The cat-and-mouse game of banning new drugs every few months after they come on to the market makes the provision of timely and accurate information harder. In fact, drug use, including alcohol and tobacco, among young people is actually falling in this country. The focus of public policy should be to promote understanding more and to rely on prohibition less.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in