Leading article: Why Hugo Chavez is no hero

Sunday 14 May 2006 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Hugo Chavez, the president of Venezuela, has been hailed around the world as one of the most exciting heroes of the left-wing cause. Yesterday, he was greeted by his fellow demagogue, Ken Livingstone, the Mayor of London, on a visit to this country during which he will pointedly not be meeting Tony Blair.

Mr Chavez has done some good for the people of Venezuela, by whom he was fairly and freely elected and among whom he is still popular. He has improved healthcare for the poor and is trying to spread education - although Mr Livingstone's claim that "illiteracy has been eradicated" was an exaggeration. Mr Chavez's popularity, both at home and abroad, owes much to his colourfully-phrased hostility towards George Bush and the US. Calling Mr Blair "an ally of Hitler" was typical.

Mr Chavez should, of course, be treated with the respect to which the leader of any democratic nation is entitled. And he deserves our cautious approval for having, so far, avoided the economic instability and political authoritarianism that is the fate of so many Latin American countries. But it would be unwise to hold him up as a model. Like Mr Livingstone, Mr Chavez first came to power in an undemocratic coup (although his was military, while Red Ken seized control of the GLC by power of the caucus). Mr Chavez is an unabashed admirer of Fidel Castro, which gives his attachment to democracy a temporary and improvised feel. As do the human rights abuses of which the Venezuelan government is guilty.

Most sinister of all, perhaps, is Mr Chavez's use of anti-US sentiment to create an external threat in the classic gambit of the tyrant. As we reported recently, he has formed a militia of ordinary Venezuelan citizens to mobilise against the threat of an "invasion" by unspecified enemies. That is not the sane or balanced action of a committed democrat. We suspect that even Mr Livingstone's enthusiastic left-wing supporters would rapidly lose their enthusiasm for Mr Chavez's brand of socialism if the Venezuelan's Mini-Me-on-Thames tried to recruit Londoners into a citizens' militia.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in