Leading article: Too little clarity on GPs' powers over problem patients
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There is no question that GPs should be able to rid their practices of troublesome patients.
But today's report from the health service ombudsman reveals an alarming increase in complaints from patients "struck off" without warning, and details multiple examples of unfair treatment. In one particularly disturbing case, an entire family was left without a GP at a time of acute stress.
The problem is one of clarity. There are guidelines governing the removal of patients from practice lists. But too often they are simply being ignored. Equally, patients themselves are not sufficiently aware of either their rights or responsibilities.
The situation must be remedied forthwith. With GPs' powers set to widen markedly under the Government's proposed NHS reforms, it is more important than ever that complaints are handled effectively.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments