Leading article: Time to go back to basics

Wednesday 03 August 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Whatever spin teachers, educators and politicians put on the results of the latest primary school tests one thing is clear. One in three 11-year-olds – that is 183,000 boys and girls – failed to achieve the basic skills in reading, writing and maths that they will they need to benefit from the secondary education they will begin in September.

This week's results show a slight improvement – with 67 per cent, as against 64 per cent last year, achieving the desired standard. But the percentage failing remains stubbornly similar. A variety of initiatives have been tried but they have produced little real change over the last five years. Indeed things are getting worse in schools in poorer areas, though results in middle-class areas disguise that in the overall figures.

There has also been a disturbing drop in pupils achieving top marks. And the number of boys and girls receiving the top mark for reading is down by 8 per cent. Schools are failing to stretch the brightest pupils as teachers concentrate on getting the average pupils to the required standard level. And education in the final year of primary school is being narrowed by the exams as teachers drill pupils to pass the test.

The one strategy which made a clear difference was David Blunkett's literacy and numeracy hours. This was dropped because it was deemed that progress was being made. Not enough. Those specialist hours need to be introduced in schools that do not do well in the new reading tests which are to be introduced at age six.

For one in ten of boys who leave primary school to have the reading age of a seven-year-old, as at present, is simply a national disgrace.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in