Leading article: This soap opera needs a new script

Saturday 24 December 2005 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The temptation with the unfolding crisis at English National Opera is to treat it as one of its own shows. The chairman, Martin Smith exits stage left, denouncing the world in general and the press in particular. The Arts Council sidles off stage right singing sotto voce that the assassination had nothing to do with it. Half the chorus of donors threatens to leave the stage altogether and two understudies are propelled to the front as the young lovers.

The events at ENO could indeed be regarded as melodrama, were it not for the fact that they concern one of Britain's premier musical institutions and one which receives a sizeable slice of government arts funding - £150m in a decade. More fundamentally they also show up many of the problems of current arts funding in this country.

Since taking office this Government has tried to push the major arts institutions more and more into the private sector, urging them to rely for their future on a US-style of funding from individuals and corporations. The result has been a greater resort to private funders to fill the ranks of their boards.

Fine in principle. It has worked well in America But the problem in Britain is that these institutions still receive substantial state funding and are charged with creating artistic excellence as well as promoting other aims such as wider access that are beyond the remit of the ordinary businessmen.

Martin Smith's failing was not that he was a philistine - just the opposite - but that he could not see that you can't run an arts institution as a private fiefdom, nor can you dispose of jobs in a public institution, particularly that of the artistic director, without advertising them.

The lessons of this fiasco apply not just to ENO but also to the Arts Council, which has played a particularly cowardly game, going along with Martin Smith at one point and then trying to disown him when the flak started. For ENO it can only be for the good that Martin Smith has stepped down. Now it can and should look to a whole new beginning. But the problems of choosing the right board and the right artistic leadership for subsidised institutions, never mind the role of Arts Council, have yet to be seriously addressed.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in