Leading article: The test of reform will be whether adoptions rise
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The crisis over adoption has been growing for years. Just 60 babies under 12 months old were adopted in England last year, compared with 70 the previous year and about 4,000 in 1976. And while adoptions have fallen, the number of children in care has been rising. Of 65,000 in care last year, 3,660 were under a year old, the ideal age to find a permanent home with a new family.
But fewer than 2 per cent did. Why is it not happening? Because adoption has become a bureaucratic, box-ticking exercise that excludes many who would make "good enough" parents. As Martin Narey, the Government's adoption adviser, points out, of the 168 babies adopted in Romania in 1989 – mostly by people rejected for adoption in the UK – just two placements have broken down.
Yesterday's announcement of an overhaul of the adoption system is welcome. It will have succeeded when the number of children offered a permanent, secure home starts to rise.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments