Leading article: The terror is not over

Sunday 04 September 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It made last month's downgrading of the threat assessment from "critical" to "severe general" look curious. If the security services were unable to make a connection between Khan and al-Qa'ida until al-Qa'ida did it for them, it does not inspire confidence that they know more than the rest of us. Yet the video does add important layers to our understanding of the threat. It is clearer now that the London bombers were not simply a group of deluded young men acting on their own. It is apparent that while al-Qa'ida, whose spokesman Ayman al-Zawahiri was spliced on to the same video, may not possess a tightly organised military structure, it suggests a degree of planning and calculation in playing on public fears.

The response to the video, too, was significant. There were few voices suggesting that it should not be broadcast. This was in contrast to the demands for censorship of Osama bin Laden's crowing over the 2001 attacks on America. And it poses an awkward question for the Government's planned law to ban the glorifying of terrorism, which is precisely what Khan's video does. More sensible to show the video so that, in the Prime Minister's words, the ideology that lies behind suicide jihadism can be challenged. So that the absurdity of accusing the British of "gassing" Muslims can be exposed. So that the poison of presenting Afghanistan, Chechnya and Kashmir as a single "war" against Muslims can be drawn. So that it can be pointed out that, in Iraq, al-Qa'ida is killing Shias for being the wrong sort of Muslim.

Many Muslims in this country have responded to the video with commendable clarity. The determination of Gous Ali, the boyfriend of Neetu Jain, a Hindu killed on the Tavistock Square bus, was particularly impressive: "As a Muslim, I will spend the rest of my life confronting these people. As a Muslim, I will fight for this country, because this is my country and I am loyal to it." Let us hope that the titular leaders of the Muslim faith in Britain will speak with a comparable lack of ambiguity.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in