Leading article: The price of drugs does not work

Wednesday 17 November 2010 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

At a time of general cutbacks, it is perhaps not surprising that commercial interests are searching high and low to find new ways of making money. But the way a few drug companies are structuring their prices smacks of cynical targeting and exploitation.

A group of consultants and patients' representatives is calling on the Government to halt a practice whereby companies can rake in profits by charging very high prices for drugs that have required little or no additional research. They accuse the companies of modifying relatively common drugs and licensing the new version as a treatment for a rare, or "orphan", disease. The money-making secret is that these treatments can be priced many, many times higher than the existing drug, thanks to legislation designed to encourage companies not to neglect rare diseases. As sole suppliers, the licence-holders then charge pretty much what they like.

What is happening is clearly an unintended, and most unwelcome, consequence of provisions that were designed to bring about something quite different. But the question of drug pricing is wider than the single question of how to root out such distortions. Successive governments have resisted price controls in part because Britain is a net exporter of pharmaceuticals and the price of new drugs here tends to set the international standard. In fact, though, our lack of controls makes us an exception in Europe.

This, though, could be changing. The Government recently announced that NICE, while continuing to advise on the cost-effectiveness of treatment, would no longer have the last word on whether a drug was supplied to the NHS. This decision would pass to doctors, and pricing would switch to a value-based system.

The NHS has enormous purchasing power, yet it seems, over the years, not to have exploited this as it could have done. As in so many areas – GPs' salaries and IT projects spring to mind – government departments have proved inadequate negotiators. The drugs bill is something that cries out for a more rigorous approach. The call from consultants and patients is a useful straw in the wind.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in