Leading article: The limits of Chinese influence

Monday 31 May 2010 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The complex politics of north-east Asia continue to tie the leaders of the region up in knots. At a summit in South Korea over the weekend, the Chinese Premier, Wen Jiabao, refused to blame North Korea for the sinking of a South Korean warship, the Cheonan, two months ago on the maritime border between the two divided states. The Chinese Premier also gave no indication over whether his country will use its veto in the United Nations Security Council to block sanctions against the North being sought by Seoul and Washington. The furthest the Chinese Premier would go was to call for all involved to "refuse tensions".

Reading North Korea's intentions is almost impossible. One explanation for its recent bellicose behaviour is that it wants to extort aid from the rest of the world. It has used its nuclear capacity at various times in recent years with this goal in mind. The attack on the Cheonan could be another means to that end. Another explanation is that this all relates to Kim Jong-il's plans to name a successor.

Yet whatever the motivation, it is most unlikely that the Chinese Premier genuinely believes there is reason to doubt the results of the multinational investigation which found North Korea to be responsible for sinking the Cheonan. It is more likely that Beijing believes it is preferable to use its private influence to try to rein in Pyongyang, rather than to allow international sanctions to be imposed which could destabilise the neighbouring Communist regime with potentially harmful consequences for China.

It is true that China, as North Korea's largest trading partner and the provider of the fuel that keeps the Communist regime running, is the only nation with any real leverage over Pyongyang. But there has been precious little evidence of this behind-the-scenes influence from Beijing restraining North Korea in recent years. China's appeals for Pyongyang to scrap its nuclear weapons have yielded nothing. And the North's bellicosity is exacerbating the volatility of global financial markets, something that is hardly in China's economic interest.

Perhaps there will come a day when Beijing comes to the conclusion that the perceived advantages of protecting North Korea are outweighed by the damaging consequences of its neighbour's aggressive behaviour. But the latest signs are that we are still depressingly far from any such moment of enlightenment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in