Leading article: The bell tolls for the bell toll
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Charging visitors who want to climb the tower to see Big Ben had obvious appeal to pettifogging budget-cutters in these times of austerity. They admitted that the idea of making citizens pay to enter their own Parliament would be an affront to democracy, but the clock tower, they said, was separate, so a charge could be levied.
The change of mind yesterday – the earliest any such charge might be imposed is now 2015 – was a welcome realisation that this great, 153-year-old emblem of the nation is far more than a tourist attraction.
As symbolic structures go, Ben Ben is to London (and beyond) what the Eiffel Tower is to Paris. It has an almost mythi c quality, seemingly embodying qualities of permanance and reliability that – rightly or wrongly – are perceived as core natonal characteristics. It is, quite simply, beyond price. And that means you don't impose prices on those who would visit.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments