Leading article: Strictly speaking, a disappointment
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.No wonder many members of the audience are said to be fuming over the results of the last round of Strictly Come Dancing, in which all three remaining couples went through to next week's final. This was after the audience voted for their favourites, and in the clear expectation that someone was going to be eliminated.
People don't watch these shows in search of motherhood and apple pie, and they certainly don't vote in order to learn later that "everyone's winning prizes".
No, they want to see blood, sweat and tears in the form of a gladiatorial battle for the top seat, culminating in the exaltation of the ecstatic winner, and the ritual humiliation of the rest.
Let's not kid ourselves that that some progressive, democratic principle underpins the popularity of these shows. For all the sequins and pearls, this is nature red in tooth and claw – the equivalent of the Roman forum. Embrace that fact – or turn off.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments