Leading article: Racing uncertainty
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The bookmakers are toying with going metric. That would mean a farewell to quoted odds such as "5-2" and "11-4" and hello to less familar constructions such as "2.5" and "2.75".
If the industry goes through with this, Henry Youngman's joke –"I bet on a horse at ten-to-one. It didn't come in until half-past five" – might survive. But something else would inevitably die: the traditional language of the betting shop and the racing track.
The justification is modernisation. Bookmakers want to appeal to a new, younger audience. They evidently feel that the old system is redolent of woodbines and cloth caps and intolerably anachronistic in a world of iPhones and online betting. And perhaps they're right.
But "new" does not always mean popular. Remember New Coke? That didn't work out too well. What, we wonder, are the odds that bookmakers will still be quoting "5-2" in a decade's time?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments