Leading article: Potholes and pitfalls
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.If it seems to you, as you go about your business, that the road surfaces are more treacherous than they used to be, your bike or car tyres are not deceiving you. The average carriageway, it is reported, is now punctuated by a pothole every 120 yards. That is 30 per cent more than there were just one year ago. The icy winter, repeated utility works and council cash shortages are all to blame.
But the source of these figures is not exactly disinterested. Step forward the Asphalt Industry Alliance, representing the UK's road-builders. The more potholes, from their point of view, the better. Or rather, the more potholes deemed to need filling, the better. At present rates of progress, they calculate, there is work for a decade or more. But there is a school of thought that regards a pothole as a cheap means of speed control. In that case, perhaps our local authorities could dispense with some of the cameras. Either potholes or cameras, we say, but not both.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments