Leading article: Minimum, as in wage
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When we launched our campaign for transparency in tipping, we highlighted the way in which some establishments use customers' tips to make the wages of their staff up to the legal minimum. Our argument was that tips are tips – a compliment paid by the customer to the individual server – and that the minimum wage is what employers are legally bound to pay their staff. For tips to be used in this way defeated the whole purpose of the minimum wage. A tip should always be a little something extra.
Well, we might think that, and you might think that, too. But it turns out that the way the Government defined the minimum wage was rather different. As we report today, the then Department of Trade and Industry reached a tacit agreement with the hospitality sector that allowed service charges – though not cash tips – to be used in this way. It was the price employers exacted in return for agreeing not to oppose the introduction of a minimum wage.
It is perhaps understandable that at that time ministers saw acceptance of the minimum wage, in principle, as the priority, even if the practice was initially flawed. Amendments could be made later. Far less honourable is the way in which they have trumpeted the minimum wage as one of their signal achievements, even though they knew it to be severely flawed.
It has been a disgracefully long time in coming, but we welcome the change of heart by Ian McCartney, the minister who drew up the legislation. After 10 years, he says, it is time for such loopholes to be closed. Better late, you might say, than never.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments