Leading article: Memo to the BBC... don't leave your tax affairs open to attack
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Chair of the Public Accounts Committee was not pulling her punches yesterday. According to Margaret Hodge, taxpayer-funded organisations have a "moral duty" to ensure staff are employed in a way that contributes, through the tax system, to the public purse.
The target? The BBC, specifically its practice of paying nearly a third of presenters through "personal service companies". Finance director Zarin Patel gave some credible responses, not least that freelancing is central to the broadcast business. But the matter should not end here. Too many questions still need answers. What, for example, do the 148 presenter/companies do, and for how long, compared with their counterparts on the staff?
Given public concern, the BBC is to review its arrangements. Quite right, as much as anything to ensure it is not handing ammunition to its critics.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments