Leading article: Let airport competition begin

Thursday 22 October 2009 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

There are many reasons to criticise airports, not least the damage that flying inflicts on the environment. The contribution that aviation makes to air pollution, noise pollution and carbon emissions cannot be disputed. But flying is one of the necessary evils of the modern world; it can even, at times, be a pleasure. And there is no reason why the first and last stages of air travel, passing through the airport, should be as much of a torment as it often is at the major London terminals.

The monopoly enjoyed by BAA may or may not have contributed to this. At a very minimum, the lack of competition is likely to have fostered a degree of complacency. What incentive was there for BAA to improve standards of service and facilities, while the company controlled every major airport easily reached by travellers from the capital and the South-east, including the major international hub that is Heathrow? The outcry over queues and lost baggage in the weeks after Heathrow Terminal 5 was first opened prompted an emergency shake-up there, but did little for passengers using other terminals and airports in BAA's regional empire.

While continuing to resist several aspects of the break-up of its monopoly, BAA has now agreed – a bit late in the day, and not without complaint – to the sale of London's second airport, Gatwick. Global Infrastructure Partners, who own a majority stake in London City Airport, are to buy it.

This should be good news for passengers. London City is well liked, but it is a tiny operation compared with Gatwick and it may not be easy for GIP to reproduce its streamlined efficiency here. Still, passengers have every right to hope that the combination of new ownership and the new element of competition will soon bring improvements.

Compared with major foreign airports – the comparison many passengers are qualified to make – BAA's airports in the South-east have long been a disgrace. They are poorly laid out and signposted, with escalators out of order, long queues for security and awkward public transport links. The onus is now on GIP to make Gatwick the standard for BAA to match.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in