Leading article: Incitement and the law
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Compared with what was going on this weekend in Beirut and Damascus, the protests outside the Danish embassy in London were mercifully peaceful and small. This does not mean, however, that the shadow Home Secretary, David Davis, did not have a point when he said that some of the placards amounted to incitement to murder and called for firm action by the police. Indeed, considering the wording of the more inflammatory posters, what Mr Davis said seemed rather mild for a politician with a reputation for toughness on law and order.
In fact, the decision of the police not to arrest individuals on the spot might have been prudent - if it was a decision. To have pulled people out of the crowd could have inflamed passions further. It would also have required the police to make snap judgements about which slogans might be unlawful and which the exercise of free speech. So long as the protests remained peaceful, there was a compelling argument for not intervening.
Yesterday, ministers said that the police were examining video recordings and would decide how to proceed. It is hard to argue, though, that no action should be taken. Among those condemning the protests most forcefully were senior British Muslims concerned that the whole community might be branded extremist because of the conduct of a minority.
They are right. Not to act leaves the impression that some issues are too hot to be handled by normal law enforcement. This does the peaceful majority of British Muslims no favours. What arguments can they advance against extremism in their midst if the law of the land turns a blind eye?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments