Leading article: Haunted by Iraq
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When Peter Hain, the Northern Ireland Secretary, laid into US foreign policy in an interview with the New Statesman magazine, he knew exactly what he was doing. He was trying to appeal to the anti-American wing of the Labour Party and ingratiate himself with those who had opposed the Iraq war. It was the latest campaign pitch in his bid to be the next deputy leader of the Labour Party.
Mr Hain's invective was fierce. "The neo-con mission," he said, "has failed. It's not only failed to provide a coherent international policy, it's failed wherever it's been tried, and it's failed with the American electorate." It had also, he added, damaged the fight against global terrorism and distracted the world from solving the conflict in the Middle East.
We would dissent from none of this. There is, though, one small problem. Where was Mr Hain's bold perceptiveness, where was his confident judgement, at the time when it was really needed? Why was he not up there with Robin Cook and - belatedly - Clare Short in questioning the Iraq adventure from the start? Neither President Bush nor the "neo-cons" were exactly secretive about their intentions. The misguided nature of their ideas were plain. So was the risk that Iraq would distract the West from seeking progress in the Middle East. Mr Hain, like so many, went along with Mr Blair and the cabinet consensus.
The Iraq disaster is returning to haunt not just Mr Hain. Every candidate for the Labour deputy leadership - and for the leadership, were there to be a real contest - has some explaining to do. Mr Hain's no-holds-barred attack on the Bush administration as "the most right-wing" in living memory may attract some lukewarm applause, but it does not really do the job. Hilary Benn, the International Development Secretary, speaking to the Fabian Society, tackled the same problem more convincingly, with a frank admission that Iraq was a mess, that grave errors were made, and that lessons had to be learnt. As he acknowledged, there was a "huge well of bitterness" in the party, and more than a little humility is in order.
Mr Hain might seem a plausible contender for the Labour deputy leadership. He has not been a bad Northern Ireland Secretary. He is personable. He has a near-legendary past as an anti-apartheid campaigner, and he was a Foreign Office minister when the late Robin Cook promised an ethical dimension to Britain's foreign policy. He has a good deal of political capital to call on. But his diatribe against the United States and the neo-cons was a cheap and unconvincing attempt to diminish his own responsibility; it will do nothing to help his cause.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments