Leading article: Hats off

Friday 29 July 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The 68 per cent of subscribers to the British Medical Journal who say they are against making it compulsory for cyclists to wear a helmet are providing a welcome contribution to the debate about cycle safety.

The surge in cycling in recent years has been good news on so many levels, and legislation that discourages bike use (which compulsory helmet-use surely would) must be resisted.

Cycling is not dangerous per se, and evidence that helmet use reduces injuries is inconclusive. This is not to downplay the importance of cycle safety, but it's time the onus was put on the motorist, not the bike user.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in