Leading article: Free votes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Those who believe that the European Court of Human Rights has a malign influence on law enforcement in Britain are indignant that the Government may allow prisoners to vote, following a ruling from the court in Strasbourg.
But why should prisoners be disenfranchised? One argument is that offenders have broken an implied contract with the state and so forfeited their civil rights. This happens in many authoritarian countries. It also happens in many US states, where prisoners are struck from the electoral roll during, and often for some time after serving, their sentences. But the effect is profoundly undemocratic: as we saw in the 2000 US election, the ban disproportionately affects black Americans.
Ministers should stop stalling and comply with the ruling. By exercising their vote, prisoners can reconnect in a small way with the rest of society. As for the result, prisoners are outnumbered by free citizens several hundred times over.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments