Leading article: Clarity at last for the victims of asbestos
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.One of the most protracted battles in British legal history has finally come to an end – and with the only morally satisfactory outcome.
Until yesterday, some insurers were arguing that people with asbestos-related cancer could only claim damages on the insurance held by their negligent employers at the time the disease developed. If, therefore, the company responsible for putting them in such harm's way was no longer in business – quite possible, given that mesothelioma can take decades to show – that was just bad luck.
No longer. After more than five years of legal back and forth, the Supreme Court has concluded that the insurance from the time the lethal fibres were inhaled must pay out.
The sums involved could be huge, up to £5bn if all affected families make claims. Quite right. Given the appalling suffering caused by asbestos, compensation is the very least they can expect.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments