Leading article: City limits
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Do they never learn? The government has chosen Manchester as the guinea pig for the pilot scheme for the introduction of national identity cards. It was the people of Manchester who gave a massive thumbs down to another government pilot project recently. A significant 80 per cent of them said no to an extensive congestion charge, far bigger than London's, which was the precursor for schemes in all Britain's cities. Yet despite a lot of high-minded talk about combating global warming Manchester said No.
The reasons voters gave then were strikingly similar to those they voiced about the ID pilot on the city's radio stations and website yesterday. The details were ill-thought out. It would not work as billed. It would cost more than claimed. And those proposing it had a hidden agenda. Here we go again. Perhaps all dubious political projects should be presented to the people of Manchester first, to save the rest of the nation time.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments