Leading article: Can you see the wood for the trees?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Independent today announces a competition for the best essay on "The Future of England's Forests". With the Government in spectacular disarray, as we report today, over the partial sell-off it broached last month, we are confident that our readers can do much, much better.
It is true that not all forests in England are well-managed; nor are afforestation schemes everything they might be, with their uniform rows of conifers. But the extent of the Coalition's miscalculation was clear from the moment it mooted its ill-conceived privatisation programme.
The very notion that well-loved forests would be sold off to the highest bidder unleashed waves of righteous indignation. England may have lost far more of its ancestral woodland than, say, France or Germany, but perhaps that makes the popular sense of protectiveness all the greater. There is nostalgia, too: Sherwood Forest, the Forest of Arden, "The Woodlanders" occupy a special corner of English hearts.
Asked at Prime Minister's Questions yesterday whether he was "happy with his flagship policy on forests", David Cameron replied with a very clear: "No". It is over to you to envisage a future for our forests to which the answer would be "Yes".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments