Leading Article: Bush's hollow words on climate change

Saturday 29 September 2007 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Anyone unacquainted with the White House's tactics over the years of sabotaging international efforts to combat climate change might be excused from taking some encouragement from this week's US-hosted conference in Washington.

The noises emanating from the meeting, which gathered together 16 of the world's most polluting countries, suggested progress. The US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, stressed that all nations need to reduce their dependence on fossil fuels and emphasised the necessity of developing new non-polluting technologies.

Few in the environmental movement would disagree with that. Most encouragingly of all, Ms Rice argued that this "growing problem" should be resolved under United Nations auspices. She even admitted that the US is "not above the international community on this issue". But when it comes to climate change it is important to pay attention to what political leaders do, rather than what they say. Despite Ms Rice's warm words, the Bush administration is not about to embrace a multilateral approach to mitigating climate change. This week's conference has been an exercise in public relations to benefit the White House, rather than a serious attempt to address the issue of global warming.

When it comes to policy, President Bush has barely shifted. The White House is still pushing for voluntary emission cuts, rather than the legally binding approach recommended by the UN. Ms Rice let the cat out of the bag when she argued: "All nations should tackle climate change in the ways they deem best." That is a recipe for inaction. Runaway climate change is too serious and urgent a threat to be dealt with in this piecemeal fashion. Clean technology is an admirable goal, but it is never going to be developed in the absence of a market framework that penalises existing carbon-emitting technologies.

There is only one show in town when it comes to responding to climate change on a global level. Representatives need to come together in Bali in December for the latest round of UN Climate Change Convention negotiations and agree on a successor to the Kyoto protocol. And that agreement must include mandatory emission cuts on all developed nations.

It is a relief of sorts that the White House is no longer in the business of denying that climate change is taking place. But the wretched and irresponsible stalling tactics of the world's biggest polluter show no signs of abating.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in