Leading article: Better to maintain the mystery of Springfield
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.And so the mystery is solved. After 20-plus years and more than 500 episodes, the creator of The Simpsons has finally cracked and admitted that it was Springfield, Oregon, all along. Since the very beginning, fans have speculated as to which of the 34 US towns that bear the name – not to mention the one in Essex – could claim to be "the real Springfield", home of the world's most famous yellow family. Now they know.
But after the momentary satisfaction, only anticlimax remains. After all, the guessing is half the fun. It is all very well to theorise that Cranford is really Knutsford or Barchester is Salisbury, but who wants to know for sure? Would not some of the magic be lost if Camelot, say, was definitely in Cornwall, or Yorkshire, or even France? Or Ambridge was without question Cutnall Green? Or Milk Wood was assuredly off the A486 just after the campsite? We rather feel that it would.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments