Leading article: An invitation that sent the wrong message
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In light of what has happened in Bahrain over the past few months, where the security forces have killed at least 30 pro-democracy demonstrators since February, it was astonishing that the country's second-highest representative, the Crown Prince, received what was tantamount to a public blessing from the British state in the form of an invitation to the royal wedding. Confronted with a growing outcry, Prince Salman bin Hamad al-Khalifa has now prudently decided to absent himself. Britain's failure to withdraw the invitation earlier does no credit to Clarence House's Foreign Office advisers, who helped to assemble the guest list to begin with.
The Crown Prince may be an old friend of the Prince of Wales but he is also the son of a despot who has set his government against the "Arab spring" sweeping the region. Far from meeting the demands of the demonstrators who sought an end to royal autocracy, the Prince's father called in troops from Saudi Arabia to have them swept off the streets. Since then, hundreds of people have been jailed. According to Human Rights Watch, the security forces have used the declaration of martial law in March to turn Bahrain into "a state of fear". The Prince did not distance himself from their tactics but backed them to the hilt, declaring that there would be "no leniency towards anyone who seeks to split our society", in other words, to anyone seeking to divest the royal family of its powers.
Western countries are often accused of supporting democratic movements in the Middle East only when it is strategically convenient. In Bahrain's case, concern that the mainly Shia protesters might drag Bahrain into Iran's orbit seems to have played a part in shaping the West's feeble response to the crackdown. Foreign Office officials may insist that all countries with which Britain has diplomatic relations are entitled to be represented at an event like the royal wedding. But the fact that one of the key men behind the repression in Bahrain was offered a front-row seat in what may be the most watched television pageant ever is bound to increase Arab suspicions of Western countries' sincerity when they call for reform in the Middle East.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments