Leading article: Ai Weiwei is free; another 1,426 are not

Friday 24 June 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It would be good to think that the Chinese artist and dissident, Ai Weiwei, had been released because of the sustained pressure from the world's human rights activists. Mr Ai has, under the terms of his bail, said nothing, but his demeanour is not that of a man whose spirit has been broken into demonstrating a "good attitude in confessing his crimes", as the Beijing police suggested. Having said that, thousands of political prisoners remain in Chinese jails. Among them is Liu Xiaobo, last year's Nobel peace laureate. His empty chair at the Nobel ceremony in Oslo spoke eloquently of the problem. But the vast publicity which ensued appears to have done little towards securing his release.

It may be that the authorities in Beijing felt that the release of one man ahead of the Chinese premier's visit to Europe was sufficient. But they may simply believe that the artist is less of a threat to their domestic political stability than are Liu Xiaobo and other jailed pro-democracy campaigners. As China's economic power increases, its readiness to observe human rights appears regrettably to be diminishing. At the last UK-China human rights exchange, the Chinese, confronted with London's concerns, batted back questions about overcrowding in Britain's prisons, the age of criminal responsibility in the UK and the tensions between the majority population and the nation's ethnic minorities.

It is important to be realistic about the nature of relations between China and the West. But it is also vital not to be cowed into silent acquiescence. David Cameron should this week take a break from the task of finding ways for our two countries to benefit from economic complementarities to congratulate the Chinese political establishment on its release of Ai Weiwei. He should then ask about the other 1,426 individuals known to be languishing in Chinese jails for political or religious reasons.

Liu Xiaobo should be at the top of that list. Mr Cameron should make it clear that the world would applaud his release just as heartily as that of Ai Weiwei. And the applause would grow, the more political prisoners followed him out of China's jails.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in