Leading article: Afghanistan - still not nearly secure enough

Thursday 21 July 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

At best, Britain's transfer of responsibility for security in Lashkar Gah heralds the return to Afghan control of other regions and brings the ordered withdrawal of British forces closer. At worst, it was little more than a fig-leaf designed to excuse and cover up the chaos that the withdrawal, as it gathers pace, could leave behind.

Early signs are not good. Violence has been escalating since President Karzai announced that seven areas would be handed over to Afghan forces from July – including in places, such as Mazar-e Sharif, which were relatively peaceful. The first transfer, from US troops in Bamiyan Province, was followed by the killing of a presidential aide in Kabul. This week explosions accompanied the handover from Nato forces in the capital of Laghman Province. Kandahar remains tense after the killing of Mr Karzai's half-brother.

Optimists might argue that it is the presence of foreign forces, not their absence, that is the destabilising factor, and that ructions are inevitable as the centre of power shifts. But if Nato is to make a dignified exit according to President Obama's timetable of 2014, much work clearly remains to be done.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in