Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Whether or not Manchester City win the Premier League today, the club's rise has been spectacular. When Sheikh Mansour took over, the team were languishing. Just four years later, their performance could not be more different. The secret? The £1bn that the Abu Dhabi billionaire has splashed out on players, with no thought for his spiralling losses.
A win for City would, therefore, be a triumph of the deepest pockets. It is worth noting, however, that even if they lose, City will only have been beaten by Manchester United, which just happens to be the richest club in the world. And next weekend's Champion's League final will see English football represented by Chelsea, owned by Roman Abramovich, who is also estimated to have spent £1bn on his team.
Meanwhile, at the other end of the spectrum, next Saturday's Championship play-off between Blackpool and West Ham is worth £100m to the winner, thanks to their promotion to the TV-rights-funded Premiership. But for the loser, the outlook is rather bleaker: a second year out of the top league and a cut to the lucrative "parachute payments" that ease the blow, with all the implications that has for wage bills and future performance.
All of which only adds to the sense that winning and losing comes down to nothing more than who can pay. Where's the sport in that?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments