Leading article: A regime in trouble

Wednesday 24 June 2009 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Relations between Britain and Iran, rarely cordial in recent years, suffered a sharp deterioration yesterday with tit-for-tat diplomatic expulsions. Iran expelled two British diplomats, accusing them of spying, and Britain – as David Miliband announced in the Commons – expelled two Iranians in response, while insisting, as is a set piece of such occasions, that the British had done nothing wrong.

That tensions were rising on the diplomatic front had been apparent for days. The families of British diplomats were evacuated yesterday. What is more, Iran's accusations conformed to a well-worn rule: the more beleaguered a regime feels, the more it looks for a scapegoat beyond its borders. And where Iran is concerned, the role of scapegoat – for historical and cultural reasons – disproportionately falls on Britain. The day before ordering the diplomats' expulsions, Iran had given the BBC correspondent in Tehran 24 hours to leave the country.

BBC coverage of the Iranian election and subsequent protests has incurred the Iranian government's displeasure. This is not because it was less than scrupulously accurate, but because, via the internet and mobile phones, it was able to draw on unofficial Iranian sources. The Corporation's recently started Farsi television service has also been seen as provocative interference in Iran's internal affairs.

Now, with the ayatollahs trying desperately to hang on to power and Tehran teetering on the brink of civil unrest, is not the time to expect a new détente. Nor can it be excluded that the mood will get worse before it gets better. The UN Secretary General was another who drew Tehran's ire yesterday.

What is notable, however, is that Iran has so far fought shy of escalating hostility with the United States. It is possible that the British expulsions were intended as a warning, with Britain – seen as Washington's closest ally – cast as proxy. But so long as Tehran resists picking a new quarrel with the United States, President Obama's efforts to foster a new relationship with Tehran are not lost. If, as it appears, the ayatollahs are hesitant to burn their bridges with this US administration, that offers a sliver of hope.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in