Leading article: A genuine fake
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.News that the Courtauld Institute of Art may rule that what for the last 50 years has been considered a top-quality fake by one of the world's most brilliant forgers is, in fact, an authentic 17th-century work – by an obscure artist – raises fascinating questions about what determines the value of an art work.
The Courtauld was never under the illusion that "The Procuress" was a real Vermeer. Anthony Blunt, the then director who was later revealed as another fake of sorts, accepted the donation believing it to be the work of the forger Hans van Meegeren. The conclusion that it dates from the 17th century, not the 1930s, ought to mean its value soaring. But such is the mystique surrounding Van Meegeren that his fake Vermeers retain a certain cachet and value, and whether this work remains interesting to collectors once revealed to be the work of "an artist" is unclear. It is perhaps time to reassess the whole notion of authenticity.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments