If the crown fits

Thursday 09 December 2004 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The bill that Lord Dubs will introduce to the House of Lords to end primogeniture within the Royal Family will no doubt provoke much wailing and gnashing of teeth in conservative circles. One can argue on moral grounds that excluding first-born daughters from succession in favour of their younger brothers is wrong, but considering the deeply unegalitarian nature of any monarchical system, that is likely to run into a few problems. Surely the best argument in favour of this Bill is that some of our most successful monarchs - Elizabeth I, Victoria - were women. Does it not make sense to ensure we have more female monarchs?

The bill that Lord Dubs will introduce to the House of Lords to end primogeniture within the Royal Family will no doubt provoke much wailing and gnashing of teeth in conservative circles. One can argue on moral grounds that excluding first-born daughters from succession in favour of their younger brothers is wrong, but considering the deeply unegalitarian nature of any monarchical system, that is likely to run into a few problems. Surely the best argument in favour of this Bill is that some of our most successful monarchs - Elizabeth I, Victoria - were women. Does it not make sense to ensure we have more female monarchs?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in