Head to head

Wednesday 04 October 2000 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Last night's US presidential election debate will have attracted the attention of millions of voters genuinely undecided about the merits of the two principal candidates: the affable if lackadaisical Texas governor, George W Bush, and the earnest if unnervingly stiff Vice-President, Al Gore.

Last night's US presidential election debate will have attracted the attention of millions of voters genuinely undecided about the merits of the two principal candidates: the affable if lackadaisical Texas governor, George W Bush, and the earnest if unnervingly stiff Vice-President, Al Gore.

These debates are often derided for their question-and-answer formats, which restrict the contestants from directly confronting each other. None the less, in more than one election, they have been credited with being decisive in determining the winner. Who can forget, who heard them, such telling lines as Ronald Reagan's relaxed: "There he goes again..." to yet another debating point chalked up by his opponent Jimmy Carter? Then there was Michael Dukakis's failure to display anger when asked whether he would favour the death penalty if his wife Kitty were raped. That such slips and wisecracks are not the stuff of national policy is just the point: Americans want leaders they feel comfortable with to be in charge of their country.

Who knows? Perhaps the unideological swing voters of Britain might appreciate a similar head-to-head series of encounters between Mr Hague and Mr Blair in our own forthcoming general election.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in