Editorial: What the Court of Protection needs is balance
The Justice Secretary’s plan to review the legal system for those without the mental capacity to make decisions for themselves is welcome
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It is four years since The Independent began campaigning for access to the closed hearings of the Court of Protection (CoP) – the legal system for those without the mental capacity to make decisions for themselves.
The Justice Secretary’s plan to review the situation is, therefore, welcome. Due credit must also go to the judges, however. Their sensitivity to the balance between individuals’ right to privacy and the need to hold public authorities to account has seen this newspaper attend nine private CoP proceedings in recent years.
It is simplistic to suggest that the court’s hearings should automatically be open to all. Rather, the CoP should be brought into line with the Family Court, where the media has access to hearings, with the proviso that the details reported are subject to negotiation with the presiding judge. The President of the CoP is understood to be already considering calls for changes in the rules. It can only be hoped that such changes go ahead.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments