Editorial: The state should not own banks
The Government is to start the process to dispose of the state’s stake in Britain’s banks before Christmas and Christmas can't come soon enough
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.If the Chancellor’s Mansion House speech is as expected, George Osborne will confirm next week that the Government is to start the process to dispose of the state’s stake in Britain’s banks before Christmas. The move would be a timely one.
True, UK Financial Investments was set up specifically to keep the management of the Exchequer’s interest at arm’s length from ministers. But public angst over bonuses nigh demands that ministers interfere at every annual general meeting, and to pretend that UKFI allows it to engage as any other shareholder is laughable. The same is also true on such issues as the provision of small business loans or mortgages for first-time buyers. Thus, there is a clear conflict of interest here that does not assist the effective restoration of the banking industry.
In the case of Lloyds, the bank’s shares are trading at a price close to that at which the taxpayer bought them. The Government may still have to accept a small loss – as a large shareholder selling a big parcel of shares, it will have to sell at a discount. That should not deter it from pressing ahead with a straightforward market sale, however.
Royal Bank of Scotland is a more complex proposition and the size of the state’s interest – more than 80 per cent of the bank’s stock – demands more creative thinking. A citizen share scheme of the kind familiar from the “Tell Sid” campaign of the 1980s makes more sense here. The stock may be underwater when the sale process begins, but a system whereby the public purse recoups its investment and the individual takes any profits – such as has been suggested by the Policy Exchange think-tank – has much to recommend it.
A pre-election share giveaway might look like naked politicking by the Chancellor. But the imperative must be to get the Government out of the banks as soon as possible. Giving the public a stake in the success of the industry might also start to repair a relationship that has become dangerously frayed.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
0Comments