Editorial: Solving the housing crisis has to be the priority
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Defenders of the countryside are alarmed by the idea from the new Planning minister, Nick Boles, that we should build over another three per cent of open land in the next 20 years. Yet, with five million people on housing waiting lists, we need a debate over how much more housing is needed and where.
The Green Belt is not unalterably sacrosanct. But Mr Boles, an enthusiast for liberalising planning regulations, should first turn his attention to brownfield sites, which offer space for 1.5 million more homes. He must look at the 710,000 dwellings which are lying unoccupied. And he should consider substantial increases in taxes on second homes.
But accelerating the tardy rate of house-building, which has been one of the greatest policy failures in recent decades, offers one of the quickest routes to boosting economic growth. This is not a time for excessive Nimbyism.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments