Editorial: Should wrestling be an Olympic sport?
There's no need for the IOC to grapple with this problem for too long
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Should wrestling once again be an Olympic sport? Unlikely though it may seem, this is a central question at a meeting of the International Olympic Committee in St Petersburg this week.
It came as a surprise to many when, three months ago, wrestling was removed from the list of core Olympic sports. And opponents of its re-entry argue that if wrestling were reinstated, the plan to allow another new sport in for the 2020 Olympics would be kiboshed. But why should wrestling be singled out to make way for other neophyte pastimes?
Wrestling has a long and distinguished pedigree. It was a sport at the ancient Games. Recent reforms – including bringing competitors into the decision-making process – show a modern mindset. If that isn’t enough to persuade the IOC delegates, perhaps a visit from wrestling’s awkward squad could concentrate minds?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments