Editorial: Less aid to India must mean more sent elsewhere

Saturday 10 November 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Justine Greening is supposed to have told the Prime Minister, when he made her Secretary of State for International Development in September: "I didn't come into politics to distribute money to people in the Third World."

In a way, that was just what this newspaper wanted. We support the ambition of successive British governments to devote 0.7 per cent of national income to the sustainable alleviation of poverty around the world. However, there is no hope of achieving and keeping to the target unless public opinion is mobilised behind it. And on that, David Cameron and Ms Greening's predecessor, Andrew Mitchell, have been less effective.

It may take someone who seems to be sceptical of international aid to make the case in favour to a doubtful public. In which case, Ms Greening has done a good job in announcing – or reannouncing with added detail – that aid to India will be reduced immediately and ended by 2015. Aid to a nuclear-armed nation, with its own space programme and more dollar billionaires than the UK, is hard to justify.

Ending aid to India strengthens the case for aid to people in countries where it can really make a difference.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in