Editorial: Don’t give up on the Co-op model
It provides a necessary and welcome antidote to the City's capitalism
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Co-op bank was the great hope for those seeking an alternative to bonus-obsessed banking. It claimed to be owned by, and acting on behalf of, its members, rather than slick-haired traders and hedge funds. Unlike its rapacious cousins in London, it refused to invest in “unethical” businesses and was based in Manchester, far from the hard-nosed glass and steel edifices of Canary Wharf and the City.
Its management saw the credit crisis as its big breakthrough moment – a marketing opportunity like none other to push the benefits of its mutual model. But they blew it. Rather than expand gradually, they favoured the get-big-quick option of bumper acquisitions, first buying the Britannia building society, and then an attempted bid for hundreds of Lloyds branches. Sadly for the bank, and the co-operative movement as a whole, Britannia was full of toxic debt: property and business loans that were worse than worthless.
The £1.5bn black hole finally emerged after a tardy Prudential Regulation Authority took a keener interest. Yesterday, an elegant solution was found – those mostly institutional investors who bought bonds in the Co-op will have them swapped for shares on the London Stock Exchange. They will take a “haircut” on their investments, but no public money will be needed. This is to be applauded.
Even so, the deal lobs a capitalist brick through the windows of mutuality. The Co-op now has City shareholders to worry about, amusing some corners of the Square Mile. But the Co-op story is only a tale of one bank’s vain ambition. It should not be seen as a critique of mutuality as a whole.
The success of partnerships like John Lewis, the growth of crowdfunding websites, even the victories of fan-owned German football clubs, prove that the mutual model, managed carefully, provides an appealing addition to the City’s capitalism. As numerous inquiries this week seek ways to stave off the next banking crisis, we need that more than ever.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments