Editorial: Britain should pass its own Magnitsky Act
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.That two former foreign secretaries – from different ends of the political spectrum – have added their voices to calls for a British version of Washington's "Magnitsky Act" is to be warmly welcomed.
The US legislation which was passed by the Senate tonight is named after Sergei Magnitsky, a Moscow lawyer who died in prison after blowing the whistle on a vast tax scam perpetrated by corrupt officials. The law will impose sanctions on a list of Russians linked to corruption and human rights abuses, forbidding them entry and banning any US investments.
With London such a popular destination for Russia's wealthy, the case for Britain to take an equally tough approach has long been strong. After the suspicious death of Alexander Perepilichnyy – who was helping to unravel a money-laundering scheme linked to the Magnitsky fraud – in Surrey last month, it is wholly compelling.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments