Editorial: At last, some sense on nerve-agent pesticides
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Never mind the argy-bargy between academic scientists and pesticide-producing companies, over whether so-called neonicotinoids have been unequivocally proven responsible for the alarming collapse in bee colonies.
With bees responsible for pollinating not just an array of flowers but also any number of food crops, even the suggestion that nerve agent pesticides might be behind their dwindling numbers should be enough to justify a moratorium on the use of such chemicals.
Thus far, however, the Government has dragged its feet, even going so far as to abstain in an EU vote on a neonicotinoid ban. Now, at last, policymakers are catching up. MPs are recommending that the use of three such pesticides be suspended, pending further investigation – and the Government has not yet said “no”. Slim progress, perhaps, on so vital an issue. But welcome, nonetheless.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments