Editorial: A dangerous admission, Sir Martin
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Statements of the obvious can be fraught with peril. Just ask Gerald Ratner, who wiped £500m off the value of his jewellery business by admitting that many of its cheap-as-chips products were, in fact, "total crap".
Now it is advertising mogul Sir Martin Sorrell who may live to regret his candour. According to the WPP chief executive, the amount of corporation tax that large businesses pay is largely "a question of judgement", the final figure dependent more on a desire not to upset consumers than anything else.
Given recent revelations about various multinationals' creative (yet legal) tax arrangements – and Starbucks's attempt to make the furore go away with an arbitrary £20m donation to HM Revenue & Customs – Sir Martin's observation hardly comes as a surprise. It is one thing to suspect the truth, however, and quite another to hear it from the horse's mouth.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments