Driving away with a fortune

Saturday 16 April 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It was always an incredibly slim hope that a deal could be done. Once MG Rover Group had gone into administration, there was little likelihood that the Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC) could be persuaded to buy, or do a deal with, the floundering car manufacturer, even with a substantial bridging loan from the British Government on the table.

It was always an incredibly slim hope that a deal could be done. Once MG Rover Group had gone into administration, there was little likelihood that the Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC) could be persuaded to buy, or do a deal with, the floundering car manufacturer, even with a substantial bridging loan from the British Government on the table.

It made no sense for the Chinese to buy Rover and its substantial liabilities when it had largely acquired the expertise it wanted; especially since it could cherry-pick whatever other assets it wanted after bankruptcy. The letter from SAIC to the Government yesterday merely confirmed what most had expected.

The final breakdown of negotiations will mean unemployment for around 5,000 employees from Rover's Longbridge factory. It is a terrible blow for the workers, their families and for the region. But it would be quite wrong for the Government to prolong the agony.

It is no longer within the remit of any British government to run a car industry, and ministers must not allow the fact that we are in the middle of an election campaign blind them to this reality. Although the £150m transitional aid offered yesterday is an entirely proper and welcome initiative.

It is important, too, that there are detailed inquiries into the decline of Rover. How did the four businessmen who took charge of the company five years ago manage to secure such enormous rewards for themselves, while at the same time presiding over the death of a once-successful car manufacturer? They have driven away with fortunes, while their workforce is left in despair. Their handling of Rover is, without doubt, worth further examination.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in