Disturbing questions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.However you look at it, the arrest of the Muslim cleric Abu Hamza raises a host of disturbing questions. The obvious one is that if the United States can find 11 charges on which to base an extradition request, why have the authorities here been so supine for so long? That this question has been posed most insistently by those sections of the British media with a known xenophobic agenda does not make it invalid. But the questions from the other side are more important.
However you look at it, the arrest of the Muslim cleric Abu Hamza raises a host of disturbing questions. The obvious one is that if the United States can find 11 charges on which to base an extradition request, why have the authorities here been so supine for so long? That this question has been posed most insistently by those sections of the British media with a known xenophobic agenda does not make it invalid. But the questions from the other side are more important.
How come our government signed an extradition agreement that allows British citizens to be extradited to the US, but not Americans to this country? How reliable is the US evidence? So far, almost every arrest warrant issued by the US for a foreign national has turned out to be based on incorrect or suspect evidence. And can we be sure that the British government is not exploiting US anti-terrorism laws to remove someone who has become an embarrassment?
The fact that Abu Hamza has a hook for a hand, preaches fire and brimstone and uses his mobile to telephone abroad does not automatically make him a terrorist. There must be proof.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments