Britain deserves more than stunts and soundbites

Wednesday 09 May 2001 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Apathy is the clear and present danger of this election ­ a danger increased by the possibly illusory idea that the outcome is a foregone conclusion.

Apathy is the clear and present danger of this election ­ a danger increased by the possibly illusory idea that the outcome is a foregone conclusion.

We can safely ignore the attempts by some senior ministers to suggest that the pitiful turn-outs in local and European elections ­ not to mention Westminster by- elections ­ during this parliament stem from popular contentment. It stems much more from a disaffection with mainstream politics and from a popular sense that individual votes have little influence outside a handful of key marginals. The result has been that Labour's much-vaunted landslide in 1997 was based on only three in every 10 electors voting Labour. If nothing else that is ample reason for the humility Tony Blair urged on his Cabinet this week.

We will wait with interest to see whether the campaigns ­ particularly the Government's ­ are really geared to increasing this perilously low level of participation. One way of doing so would be to engage in proper debate about the country's future rather than in a carefully managed series of soundbites and photo opportunities calculated to dumb down politics. There were some mildly hopeful signs yesterday, especially in the Prime Minister's avowed intent to fight to regain the public's trust. But we are not confident that this election will be conducted on a more adult plane than the last.

So we urge voters to take matters into their own hands. For unlike in 1997 there are real differences between the parties, notably on Europe and on the size and role of the state. Anyone with any feeling about Britain's future will have only themselves to blame if they stay at home on 7 June and dislike the outcome.

For our part, The Independent will report on the election campaign with the same authority and objectivity that has distinguished our coverage in every election since the newspaper's launch in 1986. Unattached to any party, The Independent is uniquely qualified to report ­ without bias ­ the first British general election of the new millennium.

We shall report with intelligence and impartiality throughout. This is a promise ­ unlike many you will hear over the next month ­ that will be kept.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in