At last, a statement of the obvious about cannabis

Friday 15 March 2002 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The film of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone had more advance publicity than yesterday's report from the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, but not much more. David Blunkett, the Home Secretary, said he was "minded" to downgrade cannabis from class B to class C last year, so the council's conclusion, that the harmful effects of cannabis were "very substantially less" than those of other class B drugs, should not have come as a surprise.

All the same, it is striking to read, after decades in which governments have been in denial, the plain statements that cannabis "is not associated with major health problems for the individual or society", and that it is less addictive than tobacco or alcohol.

This official confirmation of what anyone who cared to find out already knew is no cause for triumphalism, however. Satisfaction at the quiet dropping of the rhetoric of the "war on drugs" is justified, as is relief that the light of common sense has been let into one large dungeon of irrational public policy. But the problems that British society currently faces with other drugs – including, of course, alcohol – are so serious that any form of complacency is misplaced.

The question now is whether Mr Blunkett is prepared to use the fact that civilisation will survive the reclassifying of cannabis to reorder priorities elsewhere. A pragmatic approach towards other drugs that are not in themselves a threat to society might allow policy to focus on the ones that are really dangerous. Testing of ecstasy for purity ought to be encouraged. Heroin addiction should be treated as a medical issue rather than a criminal one, and we should return to a policy of prescribing heroin to addicts in exchange for co-operation with treatment.

That would enable policy to be targeted with more precision on the real problem areas, crack cocaine and ketamine, the increasingly popular "club" drug that provides temporary oblivion. Crack, an addictive stimulant often associated with violent behaviour, is implicated in the recent rise in street crime – but, again, should be approached as part of a set of social problems rather than simply as a form of crime to be stamped out.

At last, however, the confusion, fear and ignorance promoted by lumping all illegal drugs into one antisocial mass is beginning to be broken down. That can only be a step in the right direction.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in