An Ofsted inspection system worthy of teachers’ respect

It is good to see this meeting of minds between Ofsted and the country’s headteachers, who too often in the past have been at loggerheads

Editorial
Friday 21 March 2014 20:06 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

After weeks of controversy over the performance of Ofsted, the education standards watchdog was the focus of some welcome consensus yesterday, with a future mapped out for schools inspections that should better serve the interests of teachers and parents.

At the beginning of the week, the conservative think-tank Policy Exchange published a report disparaging Ofsted inspectors’ ability to rate teachers, suggesting it should move to a system of less frequent inspections for schools rated good or outstanding. These concerns were echoed yesterday by the Association of School and College Leaders in a pamphlet published to coincide with its annual conference. And in addressing the conference, the Chief Inspector of Schools, Sir Michael Wilshaw, caught the mood.

In future, schools rated outstanding or good – which at present are subject to a week-long inspection once every five years – will receive only a one-day visit once every two or three years. There are conditions attached, but the logic is obvious: if schools are maintaining a high standard, why should they be weighed down by the anxiety of preparing for an inspection? The threat to headteachers’ jobs posed by an unfavourable report is such that would-be applicants for the top positions are becoming harder to find, which was reason in itself to rethink the system.

Policy Exchange went too far in suggesting that inspectors might just as well “flip a coin” as carry out observations of teachers during lessons. But Sir Michael acknowledged concerns over the quality of inspections, announcing that he would carry out a review of a system which at the moment involves the majority of inspections being outsourced to one of three private contractors. He rightly argued that such a system did not give Ofsted enough leverage over the quality of inspections.

It is good to see this meeting of minds between Ofsted and the country’s headteachers, who too often in the past have been at loggerheads. Not that everything will be plain sailing as a result of Sir Michael’s announcement. There are always going to be instances when inspectors and those inspected disagree. But at least we now have the basis of an inspection system which has headteachers’ respect.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in