A-level grades must be reformed to be fairer to all

Monday 16 August 2004 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

We should not hesitate to applaud those youngsters who will be celebrating the expected record A-level results on Thursday. But their success should not blind us to the fact that the current grading system needs urgent reform.

We should not hesitate to applaud those youngsters who will be celebrating the expected record A-level results on Thursday. But their success should not blind us to the fact that the current grading system needs urgent reform.

With more than one in five A-level scripts now awarded grade A, university admissions staff find it ever harder to select the brightest candidates for oversubscribed courses, to the point where they are setting their own tests. In an interview with The Independent today, Dr Ellie Johnson-Searle, the director of the umbrella body representing the exam boards, says that universities could distinguish between candidates if they were to ask them for their grades in each of the six modules which make up A-levels today. Only 5 or 6 per cent get top grades in all six.

While this could help, it is only a partial answer. A more convincing solution would be to reform the grading system as a whole so that it allows admissions tutors to differentiate between applicants more fairly. After all, the present grading system was devised at a time when there were far fewer A-level candidates and a far smaller proportion of them were awarded As.

There is a widespread view that we should wait for the conclusions of the inquiry into exam reform being conducted by Mike Tomlinson, the former chief schools inspector. His final report is due this autumn. Many of his proposed reforms, however, such as replacing the current GCSE and A-level system with a new diploma, are for the long term and could take up to a decade to introduce. The grading system cannot wait that long.

His proposals for improving differentiation at the top end of A-levels - which include splitting the A grade into four to distinguish high-flyers from those who just scraped an A - should be considered a priority. Simpler, though bound to be widely unpopular, would be to raise the number of marks required for an A and adjust the other grades accordingly. Whatever the solution chosen, it should be in place by next year, rather than included in the wider consultations that the Tomlinson report's other conclusions will inevitably require.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in