A foolish stunt that raises grave security issues

Thursday 20 May 2004 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outrageous acts of protest have long been a fact of life in Parliament. Indeed, it is only three months since a Commons debate had to be suspended because of anti-war hecklers, and only a few years since lesbian protesters slid down ropes into the chamber to draw attention to their cause.

Outrageous acts of protest have long been a fact of life in Parliament. Indeed, it is only three months since a Commons debate had to be suspended because of anti-war hecklers, and only a few years since lesbian protesters slid down ropes into the chamber to draw attention to their cause.

What is different about yesterday's protest by Fathers4Justice during a particularly fine session of Prime Minister's Questions was not the sheer idiocy of the antic in throwing cornflour-filled condoms at Mr Blair from the gallery. Headlines about "purple powder attack" hardly imbue their demands with much sense of dignity or urgency. It is the timing that makes the occasion serious. With the country's security forces trembling at the likelihood (or near-certainty, according to the police) of a major terrorist attack in response to Britain's part in the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, now is not the time for such infantile gestures.

It does, however, raise valid security issues. Should this attack have involved anthrax or sarin nerve agent rather than purple-coloured cornflour, then the country would never have forgiven the security services for allowing it to happen. And they would have been right. There is an uneasy line between protecting politicians and state figures and isolating them from the public. It is a line that constantly changes according to the perceived threat - and, at this moment, the line has moved in favour of increasing the protection.

More barriers and tougher restrictions are bound to follow in the wake of this stunt. One can only hope that they are not too restrictive, since it is vital that in a modern democracy the Prime Minister and his colleagues should not live and work in a bunker. That would suit no one. But if we are moving further towards this state of affairs than either the politicians or the public would like, we can only blame the ill-timed foolishness of these selfish protesters. As this group and others have already demonstrated, there are other ways to publicise a cause without hurling a condom at the Prime Minister in the House of Commons.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in