Distortions of the mind
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Ms Judi Clements
Sir: Sane's accusations (letter, 13 June) concerning Mind's fund-raising letter are a complete distortion. Mind did not "aim to frighten vulnerable people". Our letter was a general mailing to existing Mind supporters. Mind's position on psychiatric drugs has always been perfectly clear. We are campaigning for safe prescribing of psychiatric drugs, not for their abolition.
We believe that drugs do have a place in the treatment of "mental illness" but that the dangers should be explained to anyone being prescribed neuroleptic medication. There are real issues of public safety over prescribing of strong psychiatric drugs, dangerous combinations, and dangerous side effects, which need to be the subject of public debate.
In this country an estimate of at least one death a week is linked to psychiatric drugs. This is a figure publicly stated on several occasions by a leading professor at the Institute of Psychiatry. The Royal College of Psychiatrists has also publicly recognised the problem. The figure is not, as yesterday's letter (13 June) suggests, an unfounded claim made by Mind.
If there were 50 "victims" in any other sector of the health field, there would be a public outcry with demands for public inquiries and urgent investigations.
As the leading mental health charity, Mind cannot ignore these problems. We have just launched a new scheme to monitor the adverse side effects of psychiatric drugs. We intend to continue investigating the safety of these drugs in order to find safe and effective treatment for everyone who suffers mental health problems.
We can only express our surprise that Sane does not share our concerns over the safety of psychiatric drugs.
Yours faithfully,
JUDI CLEMENTS
National Director
Mind
London, E15
14 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments